A consumer site for a market that never had one

Who runs it

RatedCreators is a small team — the people who write the editorial notes are the people who answer the email. Who operates the site is stated on the contact page. We are not owned by, affiliated with, or paid by OnlyFans, Fansly, FanVue or any creator platform. The people behind the site also work with creators directly, so we say so wherever it matters: a creator who works with us is marked, and the same published criteria rate her as everyone else.

One creator listed here works with the site directly and is shown as Featured — labelled on every surface, kept out of every ranking. That relationship is disclosed on her profile and on the page about how we make money.

What the site does

• Lists public facts, with the date we read them. Price, library size, likes, post count, posting activity over the last year, stated location, free-trial availability. Every profile keeps a history of checks; nothing is averaged or back-filled.
• Rates the service, never the person. Five criteria, each 0–2, two of them pure arithmetic on public numbers, all five published in the method. Looks, body and popularity are not criteria and never will be.
• Gives every creator control. Claim with a code in your bio — no ID documents — then keep your facts current, reply publicly to anything said about your page, confirm or refuse an agency that says it represents you, or leave within 48 hours.
• Publishes its own decisions. Every removal, every approved edit and every paid placement is written to the public moderation log.

What it refuses to do

• No invented reviews, no seeded stars, no “verified buyer” badges we did not verify.
• No removal for money. A rating or a review cannot be bought off; it can only be corrected with evidence.
• No explicit content, no leaks, no copied photos. The only images here were supplied by the claimed creator they show.
• No categories by body type or ethnicity. Hubs are places, service styles and content genres.
• No estimates dressed as facts. Subscriber and earnings guesses published elsewhere are not repeated here.

Where the site is going

Subscriber reviews are built and switched off. They open only for creators who explicitly consent, only once the legal entity and the daily moderation to run them properly are in place, and never before. Until then the rating is editorial, says so, and shows its working.

Corrections: if a fact on any page is wrong, tell us and we fix it with a dated note — the editorial and corrections policy says how.